The Constitution of India guarantees fundamental rights and provides remedies against unlawful action by the State and its instrumentalities. We represent individuals, employees and organisations in writ proceedings before the High Court of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India.
Our public law practice covers service and employment matters involving government bodies, challenges to administrative decisions, matters before tribunals, and litigation in the public interest.
Key Areas
- Writ Petitions (Article 226 & 32)
- Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Certiorari
- Prohibition & Quo Warranto
- Service Matters
- Administrative Law
- Public Interest Litigation
- Judicial Review
- Tribunal Matters (Article 227)
- Challenging Government Decisions
- Other Constitutional Matters
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a writ petition?
A writ petition is a proceeding before a High Court under Article 226 or the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution, seeking relief against the State or its instrumentalities for violation of fundamental or legal rights. Common writs include habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, prohibition and quo warranto.
Can a government employee challenge a transfer, suspension or disciplinary order?
Service matters involving central government employees are ordinarily heard by the Central Administrative Tribunal, with further recourse to the High Court. Matters involving other authorities may lie directly before the High Court. The appropriate forum depends on the employer and the nature of the order.
Are there time limits for filing a writ petition?
There is no fixed limitation period, but courts expect petitioners to approach without undue delay and may decline relief where the delay is unexplained. Prompt advice after an adverse order is therefore important.
The answers above are general information only and not legal advice. Every matter turns on its own facts.
Discuss a Constitutional Matter